Behind the fraud of enterprises, there are local environmental protection departments "open one eye and close one eye" inaction, or even take the initiative to falsify to show the achievements of pollution control.It is not just these monitoring technicians and the heads of several environmental monitoring stations that have been destroyed.
Environmental monitoring data is the basis for decision-making of environmental governance. If the source water injection is false, the decision will inevitably be biased, thus delaying the timing of environmental governance and damaging the public interest.
Starting from January 1, 2016, the ministry of environmental protection has implemented the "judgment and treatment measures on the fraud of environmental monitoring data".According to the measures, the ministry of environmental protection will conduct a special inspection in the next two years to strictly check local environmental monitoring data, especially the falsification of air quality inspection data.A tougher stick, aimed at counterfeiting businesses, local environmental authorities and local governments, is worth thumb up.
In general, the central and local governments have invested a lot in environmental monitoring. Online monitoring networks have already spent over 10 billion yuan, making them theoretically capable of monitoring tens of thousands of pollution sources.In 2014, the largest air quality monitoring network in developing countries was established.It is against this background that some local governments fabricate and tamper with the monitoring data in order to reduce the pressure on the assessment.The central leadership has repeatedly issued orders to crack down on environmental data fraud and hold the false Numbers to account.
Environmental monitoring data have risen to the legal level and are more binding.New environmental law stipulates that monitor monitoring equipment should be used in accordance with national standards, compliance monitoring standard, responsible for the authenticity and accuracy of monitoring data, the tampered with, forge or instigating tampered with, forge monitoring data to be punished, shall be investigated for legal responsibility.In the second half of 2015, environmental protection authorities at all levels verified 8 typical cases of violation of the law, which have been handed over to the public security organs for handling, and 10 responsible persons have been detained for criminal or administrative detention.
The fact that companies are able to cheat shows that there is a loophole in the existing online automatic monitoring network for environmental protection.I have learned that some companies have bought fake equipment, leaving room for data counterfeiting and tampering and trying to get away with it.Some of the environmental monitoring data released by local governments do not accord with the intuitive feelings of citizens, and sometimes there is a big contrast, which is also related to this vulnerability.
For years, it has been an open secret that some local environmental testing data are fraudulent.Just as in recent years some people have been discharging pollutants into the desert, or into rivers, they have knowingly violated the law.In my opinion, behind these enterprises' fraudulent behaviors, there are local environmental protection departments' inaction of "turning a blind eye", or even actively cooperating with them to show their achievements in combating pollution.Destroyed by this approach not only is this a few monitoring technicians, a few environmental monitoring station, but to shake the fundamental of